Identified 60+ parameters across GRI, UNGC, World Bank, SASB, and other establishments.
Categorized the parameters into the three ESG pillars – Environment, Social, and Governance risks.
Further categorized the parameters into 12 sub-pillars within the three ESG pillars.
Shortlisted parameters for the portfolio companies using relevance, alignment, and scale.
Assigned weights and rating scales as per the short-listed parameters.
Assigned scores based on in-depth conversations with management, employees, and customers.

Identified 60+ parameters across IFC, World Bank, SASB, and other establishments.
Categorized the parameters into the three ESG pillars – Environment, Social, and Governance risks.
Further categorized the parameters into 12 sub-pillars within the three ESG pillars, specifically for the OMC industry (e.g. emissions and pollution from drilling and production, community health and safety, corporate behavior in regards to regulations and sustainability).
Shortlisted parameters for Oil and Gas Company using relevance of parameters within the company’s industry and nature of operations, and alignment with the size and scale of the company.
Assigned weights and rating scales as per the short-listed parameters, taking into consideration the importance of the ESG parameter in the OMC industry.
Assigned scores based on each of the parameters through in-depth conversations with the management team, one-on-one discussions with employees, and interviews with customers.

Developed an ESG reporting standard and subsequently ranked the corporate actions and performance of Oil and Gas Company.
Supported in rating ESG-compliant corporate actions of the company.
Helped measure the impact created on different environmental and social metrics, such as emissions reduction and community health and safety.
Highlighted best governance practices of the company in regards to regulations and sustainability.

Identified 60+ parameters across GRI, UNGC, World Bank, SASB, and other establishments.
Categorized the parameters into the three ESG pillars – Environment, Social, and Governance risks.
Further categorized the parameters into 12 sub-pillars within the three ESG pillars, specifically for the transport industry (e.g. emissions and pollution from vehicles, workforce safety, corporate behavior in regards to regulations and sustainability).
Shortlisted parameters for ABC Transport Company using relevance of parameters within the company’s industry and nature of operations, and alignment with the size and scale of the company.
Assigned weights and rating scales as per the short-listed parameters, taking into consideration the importance of the ESG parameter in the transport industry.
Assigned scores based on each of the parameters through in-depth conversations with the management team, one-on-one discussions with employees, and interviews with customers.

Developed an ESG reporting standard and subsequently ranked the corporate actions and performance of ABC Transport Company.
Supported in rating ESG-compliant corporate actions of the company.
Helped measure the impact created on different environmental and social metrics, such as emissions reduction and workforce safety.
Highlighted best governance practices of the company in regards to regulations and sustainability.

Identified 60+ parameters across GRI, UNGC, World Bank, SASB, and other establishments.
Categorized the parameters into the three ESG pillars – Environment, Social, and Governance risks.
Further categorized the parameters into 12 sub-pillars within the three ESG pillars, specifically for the packaging industry (e.g. resource use, waste management, product responsibility, supply chain sustainability).
Shortlisted parameters for the packaging company using relevance of parameters within the company’s industry and nature of operations, and alignment with the size and scale of the company.
Assigned weights and rating scales as per the short-listed parameters, considering the importance of the ESG parameter in the packaging industry.
Assigned scores based on each of the parameters through in-depth conversations with the management team, one-on-one discussions with employees, and interviews with customers.

Developed an ESG reporting standard and subsequently ranked the corporate actions and performance of the packaging company.
Supported in rating ESG-compliant corporate actions of the company.
Helped measure the impact created on different environmental and social metrics, such as resource efficiency and waste reduction.
Highlighted best governance practices of the company in regards to regulations and sustainability.